bitcoin++
← browse profiles

2 editions attended.

On stage.

Full archive →
talk · Taipei 2025

Self-Custody ≠ Sovereignty: Permission-less continuity > Unilateral Exit

Most Bitcoin tools stop at self-custody, but self-custody only gives permissionless exit. Real sovereignty requires permissionless use and permissionless continuity — the ability for a tool to keep functioning w/o the creator if needed. Developers rarely see this side because the real chokepoints aren’t in code; they’re in governance, regulation, incentives, and legal structures that quietly shape what tools can or cannot ship. This talk uses real examples to show why technically sound systems still fail, why most wallets today aren’t actually sovereign, and why developers themselves should care about building tools that outlive the entities that create them.

whois/antuz123 records: public · permanent